Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 541 - 560
of 829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:30 am
" Parker v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:27 am
The case is Maslenjak v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (12), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier is terminated, revoked or otherwise barred from participation in a State Medicaid program or any other Federal health care program. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 12:18 am
United States, No. 04-41196 (5th Cir. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
United Tech. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:49 pm
IN THE NEWS The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) published the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed trade deal between the United States and eleven other countries intended to “improve regulatory cooperation” through the enforcement of anti-corruption laws and increased public participation in the regulatory process, among other objectives. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
In Parker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Parker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
See also Parker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
Powledge Unit in Palestine, Texas. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
The Debtors filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Chapter 7 Case"). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am
The LCD states the following: “Evaluation of the clinical literature indicates that studies comparing the efficacy of CTPs to alternative wound care approaches with patients’ autologous skin are limited in number, apply mainly to generally healthy patients, and examine only a small portion of the CTP products available in the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
