Search for: "PARKER v. UNITED STATES"
Results 41 - 60
of 779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 11:37 am
United States, Nos. 21-932(L), 21-937(CON), 21-950(CON), 21-992(CON), 21-1548(CON), __ F.4th ____ (2d Cir. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
§247d), the Secretary, HHS, determined that a public health emergency (PHE) exists for the United States.[4] February 4, 2020 – Secretary, HHS Declared that a Public Health Emergency Exists Under the FD&C Act: Under Section 564(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that there was a public health emergency that had a significant potential to affect national… [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:30 pm
They might do this, too, with the laws of Indian tribes, even as the United States pursued efforts to attack and eliminate them. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
United States and Jackson v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
States also have the administrative authority to bar providers from participating in their State Medical Assistance Programs (primarily Medicaid and CHIP).[5] Medicaid exclusion actions[6] are similar to OIG exclusions in many respects, but there are also important differences. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In 2019, the Second Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:05 am
What is a Medicare Advantage Special Investigations Unit (SIU)? [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:03 am
The Second Circuit had previously implied that such a limitation exists in Parker v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Postmaster Gen. of United States (6th Cir. 2019) ("Harm to reputation is insufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favor of public access…"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
The federal district court disagreed and cited a federal Colorado appellate case our firm won two years ago: For example, in BonBeck Parker, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Kristy Parker, Justin Florence, Genevieve Nadeau, Soren Dayton, and Scott Welder argued that two cases to be heard soon by the Supreme Court, Biden v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
In Coy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
