Search for: "PARKER v. WOOD" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Herrera nor Indian law more broadly are out of the woods yet. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
  The Supreme Court held that Gardner v Parker was wrongly decided. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
However James followed the tracks of a wheelbarrow through the woods to the home of a nearby eighteen year old named, Tim Mattix. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
On the other hand, a period measured in years may in some cases be appropriate: see, for example, Parker v Parker [2003] EWHC 1846 (Ch), where the Earl of Macclesfield was held entitled to two years to leave the ancestral home, Shirburn Castle, which he had been occupying as a licensee for some ten years. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm by Bexis
(surgical mesh)     Deposition2002-07-16 Parker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
Parker did, saying for that and other reasons she found Wood less than credible. [read post]