Search for: "PEARSON v. STATE" Results 201 - 220 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
Pearson for an African-American man who was also denied entrance to the UMD law school. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Pearson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Pom’s fallback argument was that its ads were only potentially misleading under the terrible Pearson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:45 pm by Matt Cooper
Constitution by restricting state legislatures’ prerogative to post-election certification of Presidential electors. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:26 pm
Strickland (07-689) - right of minority voters to new election district Pearson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm by David Ettinger
The cases (and the issues presented, as stated on the court’s website) that will be argued on November 8 and 9 are: Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:21 am
"   Leahy Lashes Out at Citizens United Ruling "Continuing the Capitol Hill drumbeat against the Supreme Court that President Barack Obama started last night in his State of the Union address, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy this morning called the Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]