Search for: "PEARSON v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
Term, 2nd Dept., decided 1/9/2009) Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. a/a/o Tyrone Pearson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:34 am
Nick Pearson, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:22 pm
Luis V. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:21 am
PEARSON, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm
I haven’t followed this issue closely in some time, but here is what I wrote on it back in 2007 in the cert petition I drafted for Pearson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
On November 16, 2023, plaintiff Sarah Pearson brought a proposed class action complaint in Pearson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm
Cain and State ex rel. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:48 pm
Katz was abandoned earlier this Term in Pearson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Strickland (07-689), on whether a racial minority group that makes up less than 50 percent of a proposed legislative district can state a vote dilution claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; Pearson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:59 am
Pearson, 685 A.2d 551, 556–557 (Pa. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:10 am
United States U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:55 am
NFP criminal opinions today (14): Gregory Pearson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
Pearson for an African-American man who was also denied entrance to the UMD law school. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
(Murray v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
(33) Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Supreme Court, January 21, 2009 Pearson v. [read post]
