Search for: "PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1 - 20 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 7:30 am by Eric Goldman
The court gave Perez the opportunity to refile in the Northern District of California, which he did (pro se again). [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a warrantless search of a California parolee, limiting the reach of that case to situations in which the supervisee chooses supervision in the community (and its attendant conditions) over imprisonment. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:40 am by Eric Goldman
If Perez files a new complaint, the court transfers the case to the Northern District of California based on the exclusive venue clause in the TOU. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court should now clarify its doctrine that all laws infringing on First Amendment freedoms be narrowly tailored [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and James Knight on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Institute for Free Speech v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5727, Perez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:09 pm by fvanloon
The new records include an August 26, 2016, email from CNN’s Even Perez to Michael Kortan, the FBI’s assistant director for public affairs, saying: “Do you know if Gowdy is right that the FBI didn’t ask Clinton about her intent? [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there assumed and exercised powers unlawful and unjust, to wit, in causing one… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]