Search for: "PERFORMANCE PRICING HOLDINGS v. GOOGLE LLC " Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm by Joe Mullin
The plaintiff was Function Media LLC, a patent holding company owned by husband-and-wife inventors Michael Dean and Lucinda Stone. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
A year ago, the FTC’s administrative law judge ruled in favor of the FTC, holding that 1-800 Contacts engaged in anti-competitive behavior. 1-800 Contacts appealed the case to the full Commission. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Scripps Networks Interactive, LLC, 2011 WL 1750711 (W.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
(Docket Report) Google Adwords do not infringe patent requiring ‘price-determining activity’: Performance Pricing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Since the article bashes Midland’s lawyers for their subpar performance (without naming them, of course, see Google Scholar, if interested in their identity), and since it unabashedly promotes the vested interests of the banks and financial industry in maximizing extraction of money at high rates of interest from people that have fallen on hard times and cannot pay their debts, it seems only appropriate – in the interest of fairness and balance – to subject this… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
This post summarises the issues of drug prices and access to medicines, which received the most comments from readers of the previous posts. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:35 pm by John Stigi
Feb. 3, 2014), the Delaware Court of Chancery (Noble, V.C.) granted summary judgment in favor of defendants in a stockholder class action for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of the merger of Answers Corporation (“Answers” or the “Company”) with AFCV Holdings, LLC (“AFCV”). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]