Search for: "PFIZER INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA "
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 9:59 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:54 pm
Noonan -- On Friday, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed Pfizer a mixed decision on defendant Teva's appeal of a District Court judgment that Teva was liable for infringing a trio of Pfizer patents (U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:59 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Proctor & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. [read post]
4 May 2008, 8:42 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:07 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:50 pm
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:59 pm
Searle LLC; Pfizer Asia Pacific PTE, LTD.; • Defendants: Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- The standard of review at the Federal Circuit is important. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:10 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 518 F.3d 1353 (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Nos. 2012-1576, -1601, -1602, -1603, -1604, -1605, -1607 (Fed. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:09 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., No. 06-0282, 22 BNA Toxic Law Rptr. #20 (S.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:48 pm
See Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., C.A. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2012 WL 1866839, at *5 (W.D. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 518 F.3d 1353, 1363 (Fed. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]