Search for: "PHILLIPS v. BARKER"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 2:18 am
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.): In Kuretski v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:26 am
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), Changes in Agencies’ Interpretations of Their Own Regulations and Auer Deference: Perez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:44 am
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), PPL: How to Determine Whether a Foreign Tax is Creditable, 138 Tax Notes 1351 (Mar. 18, 2013): PPL Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), Standards for Tax Court Review in Equitable Innocent Spouse Cases, 134 Tax Notes 981 (Feb. 20, 2012): In a case pending in the Ninth Circuit [Wilson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 1:00 am
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.): On Friday, June 19, 2015, the D.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:06 am
O’Brien (both of Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.) have published 409A Failures: Correcting With and Without Notice 2008-113, 124 Tax Notes 557 (Aug. 10, 2009). [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
The Fairchild exception was refined in Barker v Corus [2006] UKHL 20 so that each responsible party was only liable for the proportion of damages which correlated to their contribution to the risk to the claimant. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
That relaxation was developed in the subsequent House of Lords decision in Barker v Corus and by the introduction of section 3 of the Compensation Act 2006. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
But in Phillips v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
The court held by a majority of four to one, Lord Phillips dissenting, that following the cases of Fairchild and Barker, the concept of a disease being ’caused’ during a policy period must be interpreted sufficiently flexibly to ‘embrace the role assigned to exposure’ in these cases. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm
Prior to joining the Georgia Law faculty in 2007, she practiced for five years with the tax law firm Ivins, Phillips & Barker in Washington, D.C., where she was a special partner in the tax and estate planning group. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Prior to joining the Georgia Law faculty in 2007, she practiced for five years with the tax law firm Ivins, Phillips & Barker in Washington, D.C., where she was a special partner in the tax and estate planning group. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am
Here is my submission to the INDU Committee conducting the s.92 review of the Copyright Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Dunson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Eastgard, Leslie Eby, Phillip J. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
