Search for: "PIERCE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Liz Kramer
The highest court in the District of Columbia has held that piercing the corporate veil is outside the scope of the arbitration clause in Giron v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
An example of the FSIA piercing the this immunity is the decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Malewicz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:56 pm
Islamic Republic of Iran, docket number 00-2329, from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:24 pm by Lauren Lynch Flick and Amy Pierce
By Lauren Lynch Flick and Amy Pierce This past Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit released its long-awaited decision in ACA International et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
A group of 19 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia attorney general have sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer expressing the AGs’ “strong opposition” to S.J. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:24 am
Pierce, 732 P.2d 92 (Utah Supreme Court 1986) (per curiam). [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  H/t: Christopher Schmidt.Be sure to check out the redesigned website of the Historical Society for the District of Columbia Circuit.Mark W. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:28 am by Joe Palazzolo
He was corporation counsel for the District of Columbia in the early 1990s, and president of the D.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
In its 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am by MBettman
In a split decision, the Eighth District Court of Appeals affirmed, on different grounds. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]