Search for: "PIERCE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Aymette v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:45 am
District of Columbia, No. 07-7164 (March 6, 2009), involved just this context. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Columbia described the background of the case in an order denying a motion to dismiss brought by several defendants. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
’” But it left undisturbed the Court’s strong suggestion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
Bruen represents the first significant Second Amendment case to be taken up by the Supreme Court since District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
TL and Joy Watson, the Assistant District Attorney, his possession of this exculpatory information. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:31 am
Caldwell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed a lower court injunction on a series of Trump Administration policies that would have denied asylum to women fleeing domestic abuse and gang violence. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Currently, twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have general and/or health care FCA statutes with qui tam provisions, and another six have FCA statutes without qui tam provisions. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Pierce County v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107, 122-28 (1994) (extensive prior labor law precedents; provisions of collective bargaining agreement).District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. [read post]
