Search for: "PITTS V. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am by Rachit Buch
The process to be followed in Article 8 claims is straightforward, and is summarised by Immigration Judge Pitt in this case at paragraph 15, which mentions the leading case of R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27. [read post]
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by pgbarnes
McGinley’s complaint states that Kotz’s tactics “have caused SEC employees to fear the OIG’s false allegations and retaliations. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:07 pm by Dan Tokaji
McDonald Book Review Voter Fraud in the United States: Real or Imagined? [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:34 am by 1 Crown Office Row
However, the cases of Ferguson v IC(EA/2010/0085) (on which, see my post here) and Brett v IC (EA/2008/0098) imposed an important gloss on that principle. [read post]