Search for: "PITTS V. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Everclear Ltd (BVI) v Agrest & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 232 (09 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Abdi [2011] EWCA Civ 242 (09 March 2011) Pitt & Anor v Holt & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 197 (09 March 2011) North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings, Inc & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 230 (09 March 2011) Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 241 (09 March 2011) … [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:12 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AB (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 1302 (06 December 2007) Pitts & Ors v Jones [2007] EWCA Civ 1301 (06 December 2007) Haines v Hill & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 1284 (05 December 2007) Powell & Anor v Benney [2007] EWCA Civ 1283 (05 December 2007) C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282 (05 December 2007) Waltham Forest v Maloba [2007] EWCA Civ 1281… [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:38 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith presenters Paul Pitts and Trey Andrews will be discussing recently adopted and proposed changes to state and federal laws impacting telehealth. [read post]
26 May 2016, 3:31 pm by Lisa Baird
Reed Smith presenters Paul Pitts and Trey Andrews will be discussing recently adopted and proposed changes to state and federal laws impacting telehealth. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:11 pm
They are basically using the same argument under which a right to privacy was found under Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:27 pm
Kozik, The Concept of Sovereignty as a Foundation for Determining the Legality of the Conduct of States in Cyberspace Nicholas Tsagourias, The Law Applicable to Countermeasures against Low-Intensity Cyber Operations René Värk, Diplomatic and Consular Privileges and Immunities in Case of Unfriendly Cyber Activities Sean Watts, Low-Intensity Cyber Operations and the Principle of Non-intervention [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]