Search for: "PITTS V. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 8:17 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  The other three circuits (Second, Third, and Fifth) have similarly held that a defendant cannot “pick off” lead plaintiffs with an offer of judgment in order to avoid a class action.In Pitts v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
  Thus, “[w]hen athletes travel to states that do not impose the jock tax, the only players who can escape without having to pay any income taxes to either the nonresident state or their home state are those who reside in states without a state income tax. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:45 am by GPL
 The discretionary function exception is limited, the Court stated, to "basic governmental policy decisions," and they key issue is the difference between design & day-to-day operational decisions v. policy decisions. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am by SHG
E.g., United States v. [read post]