Search for: "PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing" Results 201 - 219 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm by John J. Sullivan
  That sounds like impossibility, which as much as we liked it in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:25 am by Russell Jackson
  Plaintiffs will attempt to circumvent the federal preemption for generic medicines recognized in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm by Cicely Wilson
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:19 am by Brenda Fulmer
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm by Michael Grossman
Here’s the top 5: Dallas-Fort Worth: 28 Houston: 26 Related Articles From Our Blog Risperdal and Invega: Potential Side Effects and Personal Injury Lawsuits Pliva, Inc. v Mensing: Bad News for Generic Drug Takers Zofran and Birth Defects: The Hidden Cost of Keeping Lunch Down Abilify and Compulsive Behavior: Betting Against the House Can I Sue… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:58 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Consider those 2,200+ Reglan cases in Philadelphia: back in July, the Supreme Court’s decision in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like with prescription drugs, the judicial activists on the Supreme Court have bent over backwards to shield medical device manufacturers from any responsibility for their actions, frequently twisting the words of Congress — sometimes outright inventing Congressional statutes that don’t exist, like in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
A slim 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court disappointingly killed the vast majority of generic drug liability last year with PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The “duty of sameness” as a shield—generic drug manufacturers’ tort liability and the need for label independence after …  (PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And, as the court of appeals pointed out, the FDA explicitly warned SPD in its clearance letter that its approval didn’t constitute a determination of full compliance with the FDCA or other federal laws.SPD relied on PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:15 pm by Law Lady
" Pharmaceuticals (Federal Preemption): SUPREME COURT SAYS GENERICS MAKERS NOT REQUIRED TO RELEASE WARNINGS, Pliva Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
I’m sure we’ve all seen or heard ads with a stern-voiced lawyerly looking actor telling us about the dangers of a particular drug. [read post]