Search for: "PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing" Results 221 - 230 of 230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like with prescription drugs, the judicial activists on the Supreme Court have bent over backwards to shield medical device manufacturers from any responsibility for their actions, frequently twisting the words of Congress — sometimes outright inventing Congressional statutes that don’t exist, like in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
A slim 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court disappointingly killed the vast majority of generic drug liability last year with PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The “duty of sameness” as a shield—generic drug manufacturers’ tort liability and the need for label independence after …  (PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And, as the court of appeals pointed out, the FDA explicitly warned SPD in its clearance letter that its approval didn’t constitute a determination of full compliance with the FDCA or other federal laws.SPD relied on PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:15 pm by Law Lady
" Pharmaceuticals (Federal Preemption): SUPREME COURT SAYS GENERICS MAKERS NOT REQUIRED TO RELEASE WARNINGS, Pliva Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
I’m sure we’ve all seen or heard ads with a stern-voiced lawyerly looking actor telling us about the dangers of a particular drug. [read post]