Search for: "POPE v. UNITED STATES" Results 61 - 80 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2008, 7:03 pm
Instead, the court of appeals relied on the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
On August 30, 2013, the Texas Supreme Court decided two cases involving the Episcopal Church of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Luke Peterson of the Investment Arbitration Reporter describes the case as follows: The U.S. firm had contended that Canada imposed restrictions on the export of logs from Canada to the United States, and that these restrictions obliged the company to sell its products in Canada for less than they could fetch if exported to the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Trade secrets—which in the United States are controlled by state rather than federal law—generally require that the information is not known, possesses commercial value, and reasonable steps are taken to protect it. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Following a statement from the Secretariat of State warning against unauthorised use and misuse of the image of Pope Francis, the Secretariat of State has hired a well-known law firm to monitor and repress any unauthorised third-party uses of the image of His Holiness. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
" Article II requires the President to take an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
”  There’s no mystery concerning how this legislator feels about Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 489–91, 108 S.Ct. 1340, 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988), the United States Supreme Court held that where a creditor is known or reasonably ascertainable, that creditor’s claim may not be barred merely by publication of the notice to creditors. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:45 am by Adrian P. Thomas
  The Fourth District first reflected on the shifting meanings of the term “limitations” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Tulsa Professional Collection Services Inc v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Trade secrets—which in the United States are controlled by state rather than federal law—generally require that the information is not known, possesses commercial value, and reasonable steps are taken to protect it. [read post]