Search for: "PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
” Writing for this blog, Thomas Merrill analyzes Wednesday’s unanimous opinion in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Finally, Mike Dennison of the Missoulian previews the arguments in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
§ 1988, when the fees were spent defending non-frivolous claims that were intertwined with the frivolous claim.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply In addition, the Court called for the views of the Acting Solicitor General on the following petitions: Title: PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
In PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire previews one of the environmental cases on the Court’s docket, PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
§ 1331.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (11th Cir.)Petition for certiorariRespondent's brief in support of petition for certiorariCVSG Information:Invited: January 24, 2011Filed: May 20, 2011 (Deny) Title: PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
” California Lands, supra, quoting PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
Law360 is reporting that power plant operator PPL Montana LLC has sued the EPA to stop it from releasing data to two environmental groups about upgrades to its Montana coal-fired plant, arguing the move would reveal confidential business information to competitors. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Great Falls Tribune previews PPL Montana LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Title: PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
(Hat tip to Professor Michael McChrystal, who brought the increasing relevance of airships to my attention in a recent conversation.) [1] See PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
HesseDocket: 10-157Issue(s): (1) Whether a federal court may review a state court judgment approving a class settlement where the state court did not explicitly address each specific claim that a class member might release as part of the settlement; and (2) whether a federal court may nullify state court rules, requiring class members to opt out of a proposed state class settlement, by permitting the class members to maintain a subsequent federal action asserting claims released by the state class… [read post]
