Search for: "PRICE v. MARCUS"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
Nieman Marcus pricing dichotomy, initially described by Mike Sherman of Law for Profit. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:02 am
Rubenstein v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Neiman Marcus Pricing for Legal Services If Consumers Want to Know Where Their Tomatoes Are Grown, Don’t They Have A Right To Know Where Their Lawyer Is Located? [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Marcus. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
I had no idea that the judgment had already been entered when I wrote on May 27 that it could be further delayed by Mr Justice Marcus Smith's new merger case (Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Gaines v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am
On the ball as always, Joost told me that the appeal in Neurim Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
The Third Circuit vacated and remanded for consideration of Rule 23’s class definition, ascertainability, and numerosity requirements in light of its recent decision of Marcus v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:57 am
Neiman Marcus Pricing for Legal Services Jet Blue Be Nimble…But Can You? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:10 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,725 F.3d 349, 354-56 (3d Cir. 2013); Marcus v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:10 pm
Which seems wrong to me.No willing buyer will pay, nor will any reasonable seller expect to sell, minority shares for the same price as majority shares. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
The starters (1) Interim injunction surprise In Neurim v Mylan [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat), Marcus Smith J ruled on the claimants’ application for a prohibitory injunction. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
” See generally Thorpe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Realty, LLC v Norris, McLaughlin, & Marcus, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 31851(U) June 2, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155004/2022 Judge: Lori S. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm
Marcus v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
J. 363, 368 (2021). [8] Neiman Marcus v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
While voters have rejected public financing of stadiums in San Jose, Milwaukee, and Seattle in ballot initiatives, those teams were still able to obtain new stadiums. [31] V. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
In this sense, he made it clear that he was “pricing the value to Apple of the Portfolio”. [read post]
