Search for: "PRICE v. PRICE" Results 1 - 20 of 20,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2023, 2:43 am
Author Pierre Adolphe Valette Jane LambertPatents Court (Nicholas Caddick KC)  Price and others v Flitcraft Ltd and others [2023] EWHC 695 (Pat) (3 April 2023)I discussed Nicholas Caddick KC's judgment in Price and others v Flitcraft Ltd and others [2022] EWHC 3381 (Pat) (20 Dec 2022) in Patents, Copyright and Passing off - Price v Flitcraft Ltd on 16 Jan 2022 and A Patent Trial in Manchester at [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
Anyone who knows employment discrimination law has read the stereotype gender discrimination case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:40 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0532, 2012 MT 38N, LEWIS PRICE, III, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:14 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0095, 2009 MT 373N, JOHN RONALD PRICE, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0292, 2010 MT 5N, BOBBY JOE PRICE, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:10 pm
Part V devotes detailed attention to the treatment of the x-factor by two federal ratemaking agencies, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:10 pm
Part V devotes detailed attention to the treatment of the x-factor by two federal ratemaking agencies, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:02 pm by Ahmad Adam
The TSX-V also added the following temporary relief measures that are also in effect until August 31, 2013: (a) with respect to the Offering Price Relief Measure and the Conversion Price Relief Measure, the TSX-V is modifying the 75% arm’s length requirement to allow up to an aggregate of $200,000 to be raised from related parties of the issuer without any arm’s length component to the private placement being required; (b) with respect to the… [read post]