Search for: "PROFESSIONALS AND PATIENTS v. Shalala"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
”), medical doctors are most interested in the effective treatment of their patients, and thus typically tell it like it is. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
See Lujan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Cal. 1996); Professionals & Patients for Customized Care v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Shalala, 164 F.3d 650 (D.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Shalala, 164 F.3d 650 (D.C. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Health Ctr. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
(quoting Corsello v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
” Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The FTC standard of competent and reliable scientific evidence has been defined in FTC case law as "tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area, that has been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results. [read post]
