Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2018, 7:45 am
In 1951, six companies from Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi formed the Entergy Corporation, a publicly held utility company intended to share the costs and benefits of generating and transmitting power. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Interpretive Release No. 33-9106 on February 2, 2010 in order to provide guidance to public companies of the agency’s disclosure requirements regarding climate change issues. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:17 pm
Because corporations need to listen to consumers in order to satisfy their shareholders, the public needs to let corporations know that consumers are not going to buy their goods and services when the corporations ill-advisedly get into bed with government. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am
It empowers consumers to transfer their digital data to different service providers. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
It chooses the free speech interests of powerful corporations over those of the public. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:09 am
Corporate Cleaning Services, Inc., 782 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2015). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:40 am
Corporations like Google and Wal-Mart are expert in the delivery of goods, information, and services to the public. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:29 am
Special thanks to Charlotte Lee, Intern for her contributions to this article. [1] Public Prosecutor v Loh Cheok San [2023] SGHC 190. [2] https://www.cpib.gov.sg/press-room/press-releases/bunkering-company-and-staff-charged-cheating-and-disguising-benefits. [3] Prime Shipping Corp v Public Prosecutor [2021] 4 SLR 795, citing Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor [2001] 1 SLR(R) 327. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:02 pm
As more advisory services, investment companies, and public companies have publicized their Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) goals, the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Greenberg held that corporations holding themselves out to the public did not have a constitutional right to refuse service to unwanted customers — a case with more than a passing resemblance to this term’s Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
Federal Election Commission – recognizing a broad constitutional right of free speech for profit-making corporations — has an echo this Term as the Court takes up Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm
Federal Election Commission (Case No. 08-205). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm
Federal Election Commission (Case No. 08-205). [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:09 am
Corporate Cleaning Services, Inc., 782 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2015). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Trainmen v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
U.S. companies will be allowed once again to exclude proxy access proposals from their corporate ballots, the Securities and Exchange Commission has decided. [read post]
