Search for: "Pace v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
I thought CL&P blog readers might find interesting the recent opinion in a North Carolina state court class action, Moody v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
USA v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The post U.S. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The post U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:53 pm
My paper discusses last term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:14 am
(here) and a clarification of a lower court misunderstanding arising from the 2005 case Pace v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:05 am
C.B. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 1:56 pm
Jill Gross of Pace has written At&T Mobility and FAA Preemption, forthcoming in the Penn State Dickinson School of Law Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:53 am
In North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
” Primus observed that the Supreme Court in the 1883 case Pace v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
The PTO backlog of unexamined patent applications is less than 620,000 which is down from more than 750,000 in 2009 (a 17.3 percent decrease)… On a cynical note, I will observe that reducing the backlog will become much easier for the USPTO, as will meeting pendency goals, based upon the United States Supreme Court’s breathtaking decision in Alice v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:00 am
Velarde v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Earlier in the week, after the prosecution alerted the judge and defense counsel to additional Jencks material the government was producing, the defense conveyed discontent with the pace of discovery and informed Judge Spath that it had received 300 additional hours of relevant audio recordings only the week before, even though the material had been ordered due by April. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
It concluded that the 11th Circuit's holding was contrary to the Court's holdings in Pace v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm
In 2021, the pace of changes abated with: The government seeking to make changes to continuous disclosure laws permanent and extend the diminution in investor protections to Australia’s misleading and deceptive conduct laws; A High Court decision in Wigmans v AMP on competing class actions; and A further Federal government move to restrict by imposing an arbitrary cap on litigation funding commissions and legal fees While 2021 was not a record-breaking year… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
United States and Perez v. [read post]
