Search for: "Pacific Railroad Removal Cases" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2019, 9:54 am by Steven Cohen
The court also opines that, although Hansen has many years of experience working for Union Pacific Railroad, he does not have specialized knowledge related to the case’s subject matter. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:07 am
Canadian Pacific appealed the ruling, and the Eighth Circuit found that the claims were preempted under the Federal Railroad Safety Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:04 am by Kevin Russell
After removing the cases to federal court, the defendants moved to dismiss the cases because the contract with K-Line had a forum selection clause that required all disputes arising out of the contract to be litigated in Tokyo.  [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:30 am
The plaintiffs asserted that when Missouri Pacific Railroad conveyed land in the 1930’s with a ‘reservation of minerals,’ the reservation did not have the effect of reserving to Missouri Pacific the oil and gas rights in the disputed land; thus, they, as landowners, own the oil and gas under their properties.  [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 7:05 pm by Brad Pauley
The North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA) entered into a contract with the Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company (NWPRC), allowing NWPRC to conduct rail service on tracks controlled by NCRA. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Finally, in 2004, LHPP (now part of Union Pacific) removed its tracks and expressly abandoned its right of way. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that appellants BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Railroads) formerly maintained railroad tracks on a parcel of land in Stockton, California, that was contaminated by petroleum. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
So don't forget about removal just in such cases just because it doesn't succeed (or isn't possible) at the outset of litigation. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:21 pm
  When plaintiffs first brought this case for personal injuries and property damage from a freight train derailment in state court against railroads, the case was first removed and then later dismissed on the basis of preemption under the Federal Railroad Safety Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:26 am
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 425 F.3d 330 (7th Cir. 2005), which held that the inadvertent joinder of a new party-defendant did not constitute a post-CAFA commencement of the action. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:02 am by Rod Rehm
As part of the negotiations leading up to the accord, BNSF removed from the program approximately 400 workers. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:33 am
Facts/Discussion: In the early 1900's Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) conveyed real property located in Uinta County to Broadbent Land & Resources, LLC's (Broadbent) predecessors in interest, but reserved and excepted "all timber" on said lands. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:47 pm by Matthew DeVries
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, 668 F.2d 435 (8th Cir. 1982), the court recognized that “no damages for delay” clauses are valid, but that there are numerous exception to the rule. [read post]