Search for: "Pacific Railroad Removal Cases" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2019, 9:54 am by Steven Cohen
The court also opines that, although Hansen has many years of experience working for Union Pacific Railroad, he does not have specialized knowledge related to the case’s subject matter. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
” Moreover, the injunctive relief was warranted since the railroad demonstrated it would suffer substantial and irreparable injury that would be greater than the harm to the union (Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:07 am
Canadian Pacific appealed the ruling, and the Eighth Circuit found that the claims were preempted under the Federal Railroad Safety Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:04 am by Kevin Russell
After removing the cases to federal court, the defendants moved to dismiss the cases because the contract with K-Line had a forum selection clause that required all disputes arising out of the contract to be litigated in Tokyo.  [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:30 am
The plaintiffs asserted that when Missouri Pacific Railroad conveyed land in the 1930’s with a ‘reservation of minerals,’ the reservation did not have the effect of reserving to Missouri Pacific the oil and gas rights in the disputed land; thus, they, as landowners, own the oil and gas under their properties.  [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Finally, in 2004, LHPP (now part of Union Pacific) removed its tracks and expressly abandoned its right of way. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that appellants BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company (the Railroads) formerly maintained railroad tracks on a parcel of land in Stockton, California, that was contaminated by petroleum. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
So don't forget about removal just in such cases just because it doesn't succeed (or isn't possible) at the outset of litigation. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:21 pm
  When plaintiffs first brought this case for personal injuries and property damage from a freight train derailment in state court against railroads, the case was first removed and then later dismissed on the basis of preemption under the Federal Railroad Safety Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:26 am
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 425 F.3d 330 (7th Cir. 2005), which held that the inadvertent joinder of a new party-defendant did not constitute a post-CAFA commencement of the action. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Union Pacific Railroad Co. 19-949Issue: Whether a state violates Subsection (b)(4) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 by exempting intangible personal property of non-railroads from its personal property tax, but not exempting such property for a limited group of taxpayers that includes railroads. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 4:45 am by Texas Legal News
., a Union Pacific train and a second vehicle collided on Main Street at the railroad crossing. [read post]