Search for: "Pack v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
But sometimes the absence of the Oxford comma can make a difference in meaning.Recently, in O’Connor et al v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
I have discussed the reform with members of Congress and it has been debated in prior years.2004... 2002... this is post-Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:49 am by Rumpole
United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
Which isn't the greatest news for the two guys who're going to be killed, or the one who'll spend 29 years to life in prison for shoplifting an $18 fanny pack from J.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
Hallatt does not act to deceive his customers as to the source of the goods and he does not alter the goods or their packing. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:11 am
The trial court -- Judge Koosed in Riverside -- holds that the relevant searches were valid under the Fourth Amendment, "colorfully" stating:  "They’ve got consent up the ying-yang here. [read post]