Search for: "Padilla v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2012, 6:49 pm
Margaret Colgate Love has posted The Collateral Consequences of Padilla V. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
"The Collateral Consequences of Padilla v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
On the other hand, while the court has been very hospitable to motions to vacate guilty pleas because of subsequent immigration consequences, that hospitality has declined despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” The NDAA therefore leaves open, and does not affect, the unresolved questions raised in the Padilla and al-Marri cases–i.e., whether the AUMF authorizes the long-term military detention of U.S. citizens and lawful resident aliens who are apprehended in the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:03 pm
Padilla (severance tax) , Shavanaux v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:28 am
(State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:53 am
Although the Supreme Court ruled in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:32 am
The issue was presented in two companion cases, Lafler v Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:52 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:02 am
People, 2011 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:56 pm
The US Supreme Court made this clear in Illinois v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:28 pm
While there is a plethora of information about how to "do it yourself" on the internet, California criminal defense attorneys sometimes encounter complicated scenarios that need cleaning up: multiple convictions, convictions needing to be set aside in the interest of justice, or claims that defendants were not advised of immigration consequences by their attorney priot to having entered the plea, in light of the SCOTUS's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
In post-9/11 decisions, the Sixth Circuit and , in Rusmfeld v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:34 am
About a year ago, the United States Supreme Court held in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
" The accused, sheepishly, states in the affirmative.Last year, however, the SCOTUS decided Padilla v Kentucky. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 12:52 pm
" The accused, sheepishly, states in the affirmative.Last year, however, the SCOTUS decided Padilla v Kentucky. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
I have written extensively over the past year or so about the effects of a seminal Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
