Search for: "Padilla v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
” Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
There the court refused to apply Padilla v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:40 pm
*Further subject matter dealing with this topic can be found on the In the Media section of this Website referencing the case of State v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:05 am
Citizens Recall that under the landmark case of Padilla v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:48 am
” This rule reflects the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:04 am
The Supreme Court has had a steady diet of immigration cases in recent years, with Padilla v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
The 2010 Supreme Court decision, Padilla v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm
D.N.H. 2006); Baxter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
The question in this case was whether the Court’s 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 2:05 pm
The question in this case was whether the Court’s 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:24 pm
The Supreme Court agreed with the 7thCircuit and refused to retroactively apply its earlier decision in Padilla v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
United States, 12-8543, that concerns the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
But in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:06 pm
United States that the rule announced in Padilla v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:37 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:38 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
United States, 568 U.S. __ (Feb. 20, 2013), holding that Padilla v. [read post]
