Search for: "Padilla v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
United States, which raises the question of whether Padilla v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:11 pm
Feb. 2, 2012) (finding Padilla retroactive but denying relief because counsel was not ineffective and even if he were petitioner failed to establish prejudice) United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:49 am
Typical of those days was State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Padilla Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:39 pm
Congress intervenes when it wants, as it did after the Supreme Court, in McCarthy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
(Full disclosure: I was counsel of record on an amicus brief focused on special factors in the Ninth Circuit appeal in Padilla v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:17 pm
Supreme Court held in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
In March of 2010 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:33 pm
Professor Bibas was co-counsel on the landmark decision in Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
Lawfare’s Steve Vladeck explains and comments: Jack [Goldsmith] just flagged the Fourth Circuit’s unanimous 39-page opinion throwing out Lebron v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
Jack just flagged the Fourth Circuit’s unanimous 39-page opinion throwing out Lebron v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Briefly: Appellate Daily examines three potential opportunities for the Court to revisit Padilla v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
Nimmer and State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” The NDAA therefore leaves open, and does not affect, the unresolved questions raised in the Padilla and al-Marri cases–i.e., whether the AUMF authorizes the long-term military detention of U.S. citizens and lawful resident aliens who are apprehended in the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
This new section on infill projects will not apply until the state has developed infill guidelines. [read post]
