Search for: "Page v. Federal Security Insurance Company" Results 1 - 20 of 230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
  The law itself is about 1,000 pages long and to date  the implementing  federal regulations are reported to number in excess of 20,000 pages which impact over 700 sections  of the Code of Federal Regulations. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Erin Kristofco
Such a shift will allow plaintiffs to partially close the financial gap between insurance companies and insureds who have suffered from a bad faith denial of insurance benefits. 1 See Exum v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:41 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This folder contained a 1,718 page file with names, dates of birth, social security numbers, lab test codes, and health insurance company information, of LabMD customers. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Also, although the insurance company generated an amended declarations page, it did not have the injured parties sign a new stacking waiver. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v]   The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, 2003 Westlaw 329054, at Page 3.  [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:42 am by Anushila Shaw
On Tuesday, December 10, five federal regulatory agencies, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, jointly released the long awaited and hotly contested “Final Rules Implementing the Volcker Rule. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
      NetDiligence, a US company that specialises in assessing cyber risks and data breaches, released a study in June 2011 summarising its survey of data-breach insurance claims made between 2005 and 2010 in a variety of industries in the US (see the panels on the next three pages). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 10:48 am by Cannabis Law Group
Marijuana companies struggle to obtain loans, banking services, insurance and security. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The corporate entity coverage under the typical public company D&O insurance policy provides coverage only for securities claims. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm by monika.banerjee@thomsonreuters.com
Under insurance policies governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), when an insurer denies a person’s claim for life insurance benefits, short-term-disability benefits or long-term-disability benefits, the beneficiary must request that the insurance company review the denial or termination if they intend to sue the insurer to obtain their benefits. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:26 am
Plaintiffs in Securities Fraud Class were on Inquiry Notice of Claims Against Company thus Rendering Class Action Complaint Barred by Statute of Limitations New York Court Holds Several securities fraud class action lawsuits were filed in federal courts against MBIA and various individual defendants alleging that certain financial statements contained materially misleading statements in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange… [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:07 am
ERISA Class Action Alleging Failure to Pay Benefits Premised on Strained Reading of Long-Term Disability Insurance Policies and Defense Entitled to Partial Summary Judgment as to certain Class Action Claims New York Federal Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action lawsuit against Unum Provident Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America, First Unum Life Insurance Company and Colonial Life and Accident Insurance… [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm by Jennifer Jordan, JD, MSCC
Utility Mutual Insurance Company in which the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Federal False Claims Act (FCA) SOL should apply to the MSP private cause of action. [read post]