Search for: "Page v. Federal Security Insurance Company"
Results 81 - 100
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 7:59 am
Even if on a single page, have a checklist for responding that addresses such things as – who should be involved in the response process, who will coordinate the investigation and ensure systems are secure, what vendors can the organization call upon (legal, forensic, etc.), insurance contacts and requirements, and who makes decisions on such things, as whether to notify, who to notify, and what to say in the notice. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Among the many requirements are mandated forms, containing specified language, that insurance companies must present to the applicant and secure signatures on during the insured's purchasing of the policy. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
(For more background, take a look at the SCOTUSBlog case page.) [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Juarez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
However, public company D&O policies typically provide insurance coverage for securities claims only. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of Education (DoED) announced a series of new policies aimed at better protecting students who use loans to fund their education—included in the 56-page memo are directions for the Federal Student Aid (FSA) office to implement various tools to improve communications with borrowers, including rebranding FSA communications materials to match the DoED style. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:01 am
Approximately at the same time as the Executive Order that we described in Part 1 was issued, the Attorney General (AG) unofficially released 90 pages of Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM), which will become official once published in the Federal Register. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Colo. 2013); Murray v. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
In their defense, insurance companies have been forced to adjust the economics of claims-made executive liability policies according to the changing dynamics of two basic drivers of carrier profitability: premiums and expenses. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For instance, the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
For example, in 2016, a Minnesota federal judge granted motions to dismiss filed by Target Corporation’s executives, directors and the board of director’s special litigation committee after the special litigation committee issued a 91-page report concluding that Target should not pursue derivative claims against officers and directors based on the company’s 2013 cyber breach incident,[7] which affected approximately 110 million Target… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
For example, in 2016, a Minnesota federal judge granted motions to dismiss filed by Target Corporation’s executives, directors and the board of director’s special litigation committee after the special litigation committee issued a 91-page report concluding that Target should not pursue derivative claims against officers and directors based on the company’s 2013 cyber breach incident,[7] which affected approximately 110 million Target… [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:43 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 8:43 pm
In Lewert v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Higginson writes separately to stress that "small" violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act are still violations of the Act; draws colleagues' criticism for imprudently wading into uncharted territory in case where condo unit owners fought back against the Association, its management company, and the collection law firm and attorney hired by them. [read post]
