Search for: "Palmer v City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2010, 3:46 am
New York City Civil Service Commission’s ruling applicant qualified controlsCity of New York v Civil Service Commission, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0401706 [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]The New York Policy Department (NYPD) challenged a determination by the New York City Civil Service Commission holding that Hope Mahoney was qualified… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
Kisilevsky (City University of New York (CUNY), Queens College) has posted Hard Cases and Legal Validity: Hart's Insight on SSRN. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:32 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeCourt Finds Gun Dealers Tap Interstate Market; Court Has Personal Jurisdiction in Negligence Suit City of New York v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
New York City, 2013 U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
Nassau County, 99 NY2d 285, that claims filed with the NY State Division of Human Rights, an administrative agency, do not require the filing of a Notice of Claim pursuant to Education Law Section 3813, has ruled that such notice is not required with respect to improper practice charges filed with it.Similarly, the Commissioner of Education has held that Section 3813 does not apply to appeals brought under Section 310 of the Education Law [Appeals of Bodnar and DeGiglio, 1990 Opinions of the… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
" On March 2, 2010 The New York Appellate Division,1st. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:37 am
At this week’s Republican National Convention, former New York City Mayor (and U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:31 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civil Practice Court Finds Gun Dealers Tap Interstate Market; Court Has Personal Jurisdiction in Negligence Suit City of New York v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
Pesca v City of New York, 298 AD2d 292 [2002]; Carroll v Metropolitan Life Ins. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
I was not able to attend the ABA National Institute on Class Actions program in New York City last week, but class action notice expert and occasional CAB contributor, Dr. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
Griff Palmer of the New York Times analyzes the Schumer-Hollen legislation. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:03 am
(Update: the New York Times reports that Davis was denied clemency this morning.) [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 11:09 am
The New York criminal lawyers at Crotty Saland PC represent clients in all white collar theft and fraud crimes throughout the New York City and suburban region. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
The cases challenge New York City’s rent-control laws as an uncompensated taking of private property in violation of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Daniel Suddeath of the News and Tribune (IN) and the AP both have coverage of the denial of cert. in New Albany v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
The IJ people gave an answer there, and IJ's David Hodges has kindly written it up for me to post: In September, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Timesnoted something "odd" about Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
Palmer, who was part of the four-to-three majority ruling in favor of the city in the eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
