Search for: "Pantoja v. Anton" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Hatai v. Department of Transportation: Court Affirms Trial Court Decision To Exclude "Me Too" Evidence From Individuals Outside of Plaintiff's Protected Class
30 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
United Cerebral Palsy/Spastic Children’s Foundation (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 740 and Pantoja v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Court of Appeal: "Me Too" Evidence of Harassment Admissible to Prove "Intent"
14 Aug 2011, 2:53 pm
But Pantoja's lawyers argued that evidence was necessary to prove Anton's intent. [read post]
What's New in Employment Law? - http://shawvalenza.blogspot.com/
"Me Too" Evidence of Discrimination Against Others May Depend Upon How Original Complaint of Discrimination Is Framed in the Complaint
19 Apr 2013, 10:28 am
See Pantoja v. [read post]
Bay Area Employment Lawyer Blog - http://www.bayareaemploymentlawyerblog.com/
Harassing activity committed by employer-defendant outside plaintiff's presence admissible to show intent
14 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
In Pantoja v. [read post]
California Appellate Lawyer Blog - http://www.californiaappellatelawyerblog.com/
California Labor Law Update: Sexual Harassment Protection
13 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Robertson Branigan
For example, in Pantoja v. [read post]
CA Employee Rights Blog - http://caemployeerights.com/
Court Says "Me Too" Evidence Admissible in Harassment Case
15 Aug 2011, 8:38 am
  In Pantoja v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/