Search for: "Parker v. Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2007, 6:31 am
As a mentor to many civil rights activists, including Thurgood Marshall, Houston laid the foundation for what later evolved into the 1954 Supreme Court decision of Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:20 am by Mark Tushnet
(Would Justice Henry Billings Brown have been wrong to think about them when trying to decide whether to pull his draft opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
CV-07-1322 in the 415th District Court of Parker County, Texas; Lynn Welk, et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 2:25 pm
Grohmann and Katherine Vesely, O'Bryan Brown & Toner, Louisville for Morassutti Sean Ragland, Phillips Parker Orberson & Moore, Louisville for Lowe Richard P. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:13 pm
Grohmann and Katherine Vesely, O'Bryan Brown & Toner, Louisville for Morassutti Sean Ragland, Phillips Parker Orberson & Moore, Louisville for Lowe Richard P. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am by Eric Goldman
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
" Pursuant to Brown, Parker explained, the Constitution "does not require integration. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Because regulating commerce is considered an essential feature of self-rule, the Supreme Court held in Parker v. [read post]