Search for: "Parker v. Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am by Jamison Koehler
” Dealing with what Justice Scalia left unaddressed in Crawford, the Supreme Court furthered its analysis of what constitutes “testimonial evidence” in Davis v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Davis, and Laura Pendergest-HoltCase number: 09-cv-00298 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas)Case filed: February 17, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 25, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-42 SEC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Alcon (Pantopaque), 2002 WL 34201763 Deposition2002-08-13 Parker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
SCOTUS Hands Employers Huge Health Care Obligations – Sacramento lawyer Alden Parker of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak on their Labor and Employment Law Blog No More Mandatory Life Sentences for Juveniles – Colorado lawyer Jayme Moss of LaszloLaw on the firm’s blog, the Boulder Criminal Law Advisor Redemption In Bankruptcy – Los Angeles lawyer Nicholas Gebelt on his Southern California Bankruptcy Law Blog  FCC Seeks Public Comment on Mobile Carrier Privacy Policies… [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:52 am by Charles Bieneman
Judge Davis distinguished the ’443 patent claims from the claim in Parker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  The “Democracy Now” site has an interview with journalist Nick Davies about the phone hacking story. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
  Reviews cover Enrique Krauze, Redeemers: Ideas and Power in Latin America (Harper) ("The Lost Century: The ideas that sent Latin America down the path of poverty and political instability"); Matthew Parker, The Sugar Barons: Family, Corruption, Empire, and War in the West Indies  (Walker & Co.) [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]