Search for: "Parker v. District of Columbia" Results 81 - 100 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia:  Destefano v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, "banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep' and use for protection of one's home and family, ' [Parker v District of Columbia,] 478 F3d [370] at 400 [DC Cir 2007], would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Gerson; Kristy Parker, Counsel for Protect Democracy; GMU Professor Ilya Somin; and will be moderated by Lawfare Contributing Editor Carrie Cordero. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Today, “every Court of Appeals—with the possible exception of the District of Columbia Circuit, has fully embraced willful blindness, applying the doctrine to a wide range of criminal statutes.” [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 12:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Parker — the first case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Public Use Clause allows the government to condemn property for virtually any reason — involved a federal taking in the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm by admin
Tatel, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and Steven R. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
On November 2, Sotomayor spoke at a National Association of Women Judges (District 4) ceremony honoring District of Columbia Court of Appeals Chief Judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby with the Edna G. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
The district court rejected the motion. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Maras v Lesses ([2016] SADC 40) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$75,000 to a member of the Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia against another member of the community in respect of a defamatory flyer, newsletter and email. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
DMCA safe harbors don’t protect such service providers.10 Inducement, as described by the Supreme Court in MGM v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the federal government could use the single drug lethal injection protocol for executions, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]