Search for: "Parker v. Downing" Results 181 - 200 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Sasha Volokh
And while such bodies may benefit from the immunity recognized in Parker v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
” Dismissing his claim, a federal district court in Mississippi concluded that any amendment of his claim for wrongful termination would be futile given this statutory bar and Mississippi’s longstanding and strict adherence to the employment-at-will doctrine (Parker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
You have the sense there was no way the plaintiffs were going to win this one.The case is DeFabio v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For past recycling of Lemley by Mullin, seehttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/04/joe-mullin-on-copying.htmlElsewhere, PatentHawk (Gary Odom) reminds us of Stevens' first case:The first case Justice Stevens authored was Parker v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), PMA cases basically boil down to “parallel” violation claims.  [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 11:58 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
I first saw the news about Thursday’s decision affirming fair use in the Authors Guild v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Parker — Whether Congress in 1882 had reduced the size of a reservation for the Om [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
., an end to official legal assignment of students based on their race, or integration-- that is, affirmative steps to break down racial barriers and to integrate public functions and public life. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Dennis Crouch
The Court based this ruling on the definition of process in Section 100 of the Patent Act and its own precedents (from the 1970’s and 1981) in Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook, and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
Nonetheless, the Board is incorrect that the active-supervision requirement should be watered down, for the following two reasons. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
In Parker v District of Columbia, banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep and use for protection of one's home and family would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm by Margaret Wood
Colorado River Aqueduct, From Colorado River to Lake Mathews, Parker Dam, San Bernardino County, CA. [read post]