Search for: "Parker v. Downing" Results 101 - 120 of 491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
The NFIB blog argues that in Seila Law v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
” Further, and importantly, as reported by the IPKAT, even in China, the Beijing internet Court in its decision in th case of Feilin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
 This current Copyright Board “2.0” is the 1989 replacement for Canada’s then 53-year-old internationally admired and exemplary Copyright Appeal Board “1.0”, which  established in 1936 as a result of the legendary 1935 report of the Parker Commission.The Copyright Appeal Board consisted of a judge and two public servants, all of whom served part time. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am by MBettman
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm by John Floyd
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down   In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Canadian Bar Association “IP Day” – May 30, 2019At the Canadian Bar Association’s perennial “IP day” on May 30, 2019, there was a first ever “town hall” session on the Copyright Board (the “Board”). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 11:55 am by Ilya Somin
The decision was still backed by more recent precedent, most notably the Court's 1954 decision in Berman v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Johnson remembered how a conservative court struck down key features of the New Deal. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]