Search for: "Parker v. Downing" Results 161 - 180 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am by By Rose Saxe, AIDS Project
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Kristy Parker and Ben Berwick argued that Trump’s threat violates the officials’ first amendment right to criticize the president. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:10 pm by Cooper Quintin
Slides: https://www.eff.org/files/privacy-badger-panopticlick-v-trackers.pdf Video: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/hopeconf/videos/130664570 Share this: Join EFF [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:46 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Watch the Deliberate Resistance: LGBT Prisoner Rights 20 Years After Farmer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
Kennedy, looked like probable votes to stroke down the individual mandate.” [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
 In addition, contrary to the respondents' contentions, the order appealed from is appealable as of right, as it decided motions made upon notice and affected a substantial right of the parties (see CPLR 5701[a][2][v]; Parker v Mobil Oil Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
 In addition, contrary to the respondents' contentions, the order appealed from is appealable as of right, as it decided motions made upon notice and affected a substantial right of the parties (see CPLR 5701[a][2][v]; Parker v Mobil Oil Corp. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 1 November 2015. [read post]