Search for: "Parker v. Matthews"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Haupt, Professional Speech (October 13, 2014).Georgina Yeomans, The Constitutionality of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 in Light of Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Parker & Allstate Prop. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
An earlier iteration of the case was GVR’d and returned to the Sixth Circuit in light of the Court’s per curiam decision in Parker v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
” The Times also covers Parker’s recent remarks. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
If done correctly, there is no transfer penalty and, since the check is payable to the community spouse, the payments received are income to the community spouse and do not impact the Medicaid eligibility determination.Example: Here is an example from a precedent setting case that was handled several years ago by attorney Matthew Parker of Marshall, Parker and Weber. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:48 am
by Matthew H. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Matthew John Ryan and Prime Rate And Return, LLC, individually and doing business as American Integrity Financial Co.Case number: 10-cv-0513 (United States District Court for the Northern District of New York)Case filed: May 3, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 2, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-47 SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 12:53 pm
This lecture will trace the evolution of the doctrine from its common law origins in Sir Matthew Hale's seventeenth century treatise, De Portis Maris (Of the Gates of the Sea) through its incorporation into American Constitutional Law to the major synthesis of rate regulation in the 1944 decision in Hope Natural Gas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:40 am
The message I got from Parker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
The case is Morris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
In Parker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:27 am
The Supreme Court ruling in Parker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
In Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
This is the odd question addressed in the Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
The unanimous per curium opinion is in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
From today's Supreme Court decision in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Parker v. [read post]
