Search for: "Parker v. Matthews" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Haupt, Professional Speech (October 13, 2014).Georgina Yeomans, The Constitutionality of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 in Light of Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
  An earlier iteration of the case was GVR’d and returned to the Sixth Circuit in light of the Court’s per curiam decision in Parker v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Clara Spera
” The Times also covers Parker’s recent remarks. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 10:13 am by Jeff Marshall
If done correctly, there is no transfer penalty and, since the check is payable to the community spouse, the payments received are income to the community spouse and do not impact the Medicaid eligibility determination.Example: Here is an example from a precedent setting case that was handled several years ago by attorney Matthew Parker of Marshall, Parker and Weber. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Matthew John Ryan and Prime Rate And Return, LLC, individually and doing business as American Integrity Financial Co.Case number: 10-cv-0513 (United States District Court for the Northern District of New York)Case filed: May 3, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 2, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-47 SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 12:53 pm by arester
This lecture will trace the evolution of the doctrine from its common law origins in Sir Matthew Hale's seventeenth century treatise, De Portis Maris (Of the Gates of the Sea) through its incorporation into American Constitutional Law to the major synthesis of rate regulation in the 1944 decision in Hope Natural Gas v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:45 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Sixth Circuit chided “Flimsiest of rationales” For habeas grant Opinion:  pdf  html [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm by Milan Markovic
This is the odd question addressed in the Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. [read post]