Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 3:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Turner & Ors, R (on the application of) v Southampton City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 1290 (27 November 2009) Martin v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 1289 (27 November 2009) Z & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2009] EWCA Civ 1287 (27 November 2009) Parker [...] [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Grubb v Grubb [2009] EWCA Civ 976 (25 September 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Davies v Global Strategies Group Hong Kong Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 2342 (QB) (25 September 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Age UK, R (on the application of) v Attorney General [2009] EWHC 2336 (Admin) (25 September 2009) Parker [...] [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:51 am
Postal Service and Parker Drilling Management Services v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:13 am
Parker (Reservation Lands - Diminishment) on 3/22/16. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
Varjabedian Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:38 am
He loses the case because courts are not allowed to entertain challenges like this.The case is J.S. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:47 pm
In SEIU v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Parker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:13 am
Parker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 8:14 am
Oral arguments in the First Circuit, in Parker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:07 am
This sort of uncertainty is typical in litigation of this sort -- one reason why I like to show my students in Constitutional Law the excellent film about Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:00 pm
The case (Parker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
During argument in Parker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:38 am
Parker J agreed. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
From today's Supreme Court decision in Parker v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm
Parker, No. 10-50248 (8-22-11) (Per curiam with B. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
Parker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Rowe v Fisher, 2011 NY Slip Op 01721 (1st Dept. 2011) “The motion court properly precluded plaintiffs’ expert testimony on chelation because the expert’s theories were contrary to the medical literature on the subject and therefore “unreliable” (Parker v Mobile Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 447 [2006]). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:30 pm
Benson and Parker v. [read post]
