Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 261 - 280 of 2,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Though Parker had been unable to make bail, McDowell had given Parker a bail-like release (something that a jailer was apparently allowed to do), but then threatened to revoke it if Parker voted for a candidate of whom McDowell disapproved. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am by Eleonora Rosati
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
EPA Assistant Administrator Susan Parker Bodine explained that the timing of the reversal stems from the lifting of coronavirus social distancing restrictions. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
The approach taken by the FTT followed Parker v Waller (2012) UKUT 301 (LC) (our note) on sections 73 and 74 of the Housing Act 2004 (as have indeed all RRO cases). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]