Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Parker (“Appellant”). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:48 am
In Parker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:40 am
The post Huey Lewis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 7:05 pm
"Parker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:09 am
Regina v Clinton; Regina v Parker; Regina v Evans [2011] EWCA Crim 2; [2012] WLR (D) 2 “For the purposes of the partial defence to murder of loss of self-control, where such loss of self-control was triggered by sexual infidelity that could not, on its own, qualify as a trigger for the purposes of the defence. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:38 am
Supreme Court, June 10, 2019, Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm
Comprelli v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 12:47 pm
Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Nebraska v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:45 pm
In his private capacity he is co-counsel for the plaintiffs in Parker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm
Parker, a capital case that has been pending on direct appeal for about 15 years. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:57 am
Mirror of Justice comments on Parker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
In Parker-Grose v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Apple (Supreme Court 2021) A new petition for certiorari asks the court whether Parker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
In Amber Parker v.... [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:40 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am
1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
