Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 41 - 60 of 2,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 2:09 am by sally
Regina v Clinton; Regina v Parker; Regina v Evans [2011] EWCA Crim 2; [2012] WLR (D) 2 “For the purposes of the partial defence to murder of loss of self-control, where such loss of self-control was triggered by sexual infidelity that could not, on its own, qualify as a trigger for the purposes of the defence. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 12:47 pm by Seth Davis
Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Nebraska v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:45 pm
In his private capacity he is co-counsel for the plaintiffs in Parker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Parker, a capital case that has been pending on direct appeal for about 15 years. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple (Supreme Court 2021) A new petition for certiorari asks the court whether Parker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]