Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:46 am
Parker. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 11:14 am
The pro se litigant, Leonard Parker, also represented himself on appeal. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
Employee disciplined for failing to wear a vehicle seat belt properlyDepartment of Sanitation v Parker, OATH Index #1923/10The New York City Department of Sanitation sought discipline against Michael Parker, a sanitation worker, for improperly wearing his seatbelt while operating a Department vehicle. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Not in Anyone’s Backyard: Exploring Environmental Inequality under Section 15 of the Charter and Flexibility after Fraser v Canada 2022 27 Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform 19, 2022 CanLIIDocs 952 Larissa Parker is a recent graduate of the McGill Faculty of Law and the 2021 recipient of the David L. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 12:16 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:24 am
Here is the opinion in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 2:47 am
Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
In Parker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:25 pm
Parker. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:21 am
Parker, et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:39 am
Here are the materials in Cayuga Nation v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
USA v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:35 am
In Parker and Parker v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd [2012] EWHC 2156 (Comm), the High Court held that the Defendant insurers, National Farmers Union (NFU), could not avoid the claim of the First Claimant, Mrs. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 11:57 am
Omegaflex v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:43 pm
See Atkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:04 am
Parker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
Venable v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
Prof Goldman: "Search Engine 'Cache' Function Covered by Implied License - Parker v Yahoo": This lawsuit squarely revisits the ground covered in the Field v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
The unanimous per curium opinion is in Parker v. [read post]
