Search for: "Parks v. Brown" Results 41 - 60 of 852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am by Alex Phipps
Defendants’ convictions arose from a 2018 incident in the parking lot of the Yadkin County Sheriff’s Office. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Winter Park, 116 F.3d 1396, 1402 n.4 (11th Cir. 1997); Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Emma Snell
Katelyn Polantz and Pamela Brown report for CNN. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:05 am by Gene Takagi
In response to the Fahrenthold tweet above.]Lucy Bernholz: Crusaders: The Philanthropic Funders That Helped Bring an End to Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
The editorial is clumsy because it ignores Justice Alito’s defense of the reversal of precedent in his invocation of Brown’s overruling of Plessy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Issues regarding the technological competence of licensees (or lack thereof) have been noted by the Judiciary (recognized long-ago by Justice Brown as itself operating in a Jurassic park[5]). [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar Professor of Law and International Affairs Acting University Ombudsperson (from October 2021) University Ombudsperson Elect Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802    1.814.863.3640 (direct) ||  lcb11@psu.edu     I appreciate the turnout for an event that by its title would no longer create the buzz and excitement that it might have in the 17thcentury, much less the 13th. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]