Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2025, 6:54 am by Dan Bressler
The opinion asks the Superior Court to affirm the denial, saying DeAngelo did not credibly show he believed he had a privileged relationship with Podraza. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
 The Court in Heasley reasoned that the Hills and Ridges Doctrine was intended to protect property owners from an undue burden of ensuring that open spaces such as sidewalks and parking lots are constantly kept clear of snow and ice. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
In other words, the exclusion upholds the all-American principle that you cannot get something (coverage) for nothing.The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the erroneous decisions of the trial court and the Superior Court in this Rush case and thereby upheld the validity and enforceability of the regular use exclusion. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 11:06 am by INFORRM
Another County Court decision does little to advance the cause of action in Australian law, and it obviously remains to be seen if there will be an appeal in this matter such that a superior court will have the opportunity to consider the development of the tort. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Monday 21 October 2024, there was an application by the claimant in the case of Ibrahim v Kennedy KB-2023-002865. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
More specifically, the court noted that the Plaintiff had cited to the case of Heasley v. [read post]