Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The superior court erred in reversing a DMV civil revocation of a driver’s license in a case where the appellee refused to consent to a chemical analysis after being charged with DWI. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:11 am by PaulKostro
On a determination of abuse or neglect, N.J.S.A. 9:2-18 allows agencies to file a complaint in the Superior Court seeking the termination of parental rights. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
Bombardier filed a motion in the Superior Court to homologate the transaction and Union Carbide sought to strike certain allegations from the motion that referred to the mediation.Read the Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision (French).Dec. 12 — British Columbia — Sattva Capital Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:46 am
Blackford Superior Court Judge John Forcum dismissed the charge as unconstitutional, and the state appealed. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
  A few months after the adoption of Escondido’s rent control ordinance, they filed suit in San Diego County Superior Court. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:50 am by Sean Wajert
Superior Ct., 12 Cal.4th 631, 638 (1996); Anderson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:36 pm
District of Columbia Court of Appeals: Derosiers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
10 Tips on Defending the DWI blood & urine case in Asbury Park and Monmouth CountyBy Kenneth Vercammen, Co-chair, ABA Criminal Law Committee Solo Division1. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
The case began when a mobile home park operator asserted the city's mobile home rent control ordinance was a taking, and sought administrative relief and brought suit in federal court. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:09 pm by Pamela Fasick
Justices Siggins and Justice Horner (Assigned Judge of the Alameda County Superior Court) concurred. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am by Patricia Salkin
Superior Court, 542 P.2d 237 (Calif.1975), there was an 80% loss in value as a result of the regulation. [read post]