Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 933
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Super. 2017), in which the Superior Court ruled, in a case of first impression, that a business does not have a duty to protect its invitees against the dangers associated with adjoining roadways. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
        Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Texas Supreme Court justices will entertain oral argument on the issue when they convene out of town -- in Houston -- tomorrow.The case is styled Hiawatha Henry, et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:15 am by Patricia Salkin
Furthermore, the court agreed with the Board, superior court, and court of appeals that special circumstances applied to the property. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:07 am
"Given all this, it's somewhat surprising that the Court of Appeal decided to hear the writ. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
Here, however, the record reflected the City’s planning board reviewed traffic, parking, and safety issues as part of its site plan review, and that the Superior Court upheld the site plan. [read post]