Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 7:07 am
"Given all this, it's somewhat surprising that the Court of Appeal decided to hear the writ. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
CV-2014-014745 (Arizona Superior Court, Maricopa County). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:51 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:44 pm
The superior court ruled in favor of the Department. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Grinyov v. 303 Taxi, LLC, 2017 IL App (1st) 160193. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm
Here, however, the record reflected the City’s planning board reviewed traffic, parking, and safety issues as part of its site plan review, and that the Superior Court upheld the site plan. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
Just like the Supreme Court did in 1997 in Reno v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:46 pm
Accordingly, the superior court’s order granting City’s petition was reversed, and the superior court was directed to enter a new order denying City’s petition. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
Park, J.D. [read post]
26 May 2017, 11:13 pm
Kevin Craven, et. al, & Alcides Yedro, Case No.: 37-2016-00003206COURT LOCATION: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION, Hall Of Justice, 330 West Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101 [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:17 am
Additional Resources: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:31 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:58 pm
Similarly, the court of appeals in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm
(currently on the Ontario Court of Appeal, then a judge of the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto) in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178: [4] Providers of music to the public have had to adapt to changes in technology in order to continue to provide their particular service. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Best, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, held that a third party, who had knowledge that the motorist they were texting was driving at a time the parties were exchanging text messages, could be found liable for any resulting damages. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Gerasi v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:48 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
