Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
., went to the park at about 6:30 p.m. to play basketball with his older brother, his father, and his uncle. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 2:19 pm
  They usually don't happen in the parking lot of the Superior Court in Santa Monica.Yikes.I can't tell from the opinion what the defendant was doing in the parking lot. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
Superior Court (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 828, review granted June 25, 2014, No. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:59 am
Superior Court (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 336); dogs (more precisely their owners), (Phillips v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
Noble (Orange County Superior Court No. 197563), in which the California Court of Appeal found that private parties can regulate parking on public streets in order to protect the association’s property values. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:33 am
Particularly for my gun-loving friends.Assume that the Supreme Court decides in McDonald that the Second Amendment applies to the states. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:54 am
  Ending the lull, in a decision filled with different conflict of laws issues, the Quebec Superior Court held, in Bil’In Village Council and Yassin v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:16 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Accordingly, the Court affirmed the Superior Court in part, but for reasons that differed from the Superior Court, and remanded the case back to that court for further proceedings. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:53 am by Patricia Salkin
Rochester City Council v Rochester Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2018 WL 4266716 (NH 9/7/2018) [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm by Mark Ashton
In a reported three judge panel decision issued on June 12, 2020, the Superior Court appears to have made it easier for parties to avoid a contractual agreement on the basis of duress. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:59 am by Evan M. Levow
Arbuckle, appealed his conviction after a trial de novo in the Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
In regards to the section of the statute which allowed for parking in front of the structure, the court found that the superior court quoted the language of the ordinance in its analysis, but failed to take into consideration the plain language of the statute which only allowed up to ten percent of the off-street parking. [read post]