Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
The Superior Court, 120 residents of a mobile home park in Alameda County sued the park owners complaining that they had not maintained the common areas of the park and subjected residents to substandard living conditions. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed the parameters of this right in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Miyagi v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
Zalat v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Grinyov v. 303 Taxi, LLC, 2017 IL App (1st) 160193. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 12:15 am
The Delaware Supreme Court suggested that the board has such a right in Stroud v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Marie Largen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:28 pm
Updating this ILB entry from September 25th on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of John Doe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:47 pm
Rancho De Calistoga v City of Calistoga, 2015 WL 5158703 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:17 am
Additional Resources: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
In the case Galette v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:39 pm
As Justice Brown stated in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:28 pm
See Schmidt v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:02 am
The Court of Appeals found that the Superior Court Judgeconcluded that the initial search warra [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:31 am
Abbott Orange Citizens for Parks and Recreation v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:34 am
A new case filed this week in SF Superior Court. [read post]
