Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
An owner must enforce an order through either the Small Claims Court or Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
The Superior Court judge erred in dismissing the amended and particularized motion for authorization and to obtain the status of representative, against the appellants. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Depp v NGN [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) on 2 November 2020. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Lockett v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
The County may also bring a civil action in Superior Court. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
Khan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
Charlottesville’s leaders recently had voted to remove Lee’s statue from the downtown park that no longer carried his name. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Superior Court. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:46 am
Hall v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
In addition to this statute, Parks relied on State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
In another recent trial court decision on SB 35 (Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
The Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
